Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi L200: Ultimate Pick-Up Showdown

Pick-up trucks like the Ford Ranger and Mitsubishi L200 dominate the market for their versatility, blending workhorse utility with everyday drivability. Both models feature diesel engines, four-wheel drive, and robust builds suited for tough jobs and off-road adventures. This comparison dives into their engines, handling, interiors, payloads, and more to help you decide which one fits your lifestyle.

Engine Power and Transmission Options

The heart of any pick-up lies in its engine and gearbox. The Ford Ranger employs a 2.0-litre four-cylinder diesel producing 168bhp and 420Nm of torque, paired with a sophisticated 10-speed automatic transmission. This setup delivers smooth shifts and flexibility across a wide rev range, making it ideal for highway cruising and overtaking.

In contrast, the Mitsubishi L200 relies on a 2.2-litre diesel unit offering 148bhp and 400Nm, connected to a six-speed automatic. While it provides solid low-end pull, the fewer gears mean it works harder at higher speeds, sometimes kicking down more frequently during acceleration.

Performance tests reveal tight margins: the Ranger edges ahead with 11.0 seconds to 60mph, while the L200 trails by just 0.2 seconds. In-gear acceleration highlights the Ranger’s advantage; it posts quicker 50-70mph times in multiple gears (6.8-7.7 seconds), compared to the L200’s 9.2 seconds in fifth.

Fuel Efficiency and Running Costs

Efficiency matters for long hauls and fleet use. The Ranger achieves 33.5mpg in tests, slightly better than the L200’s 31.4mpg. CO2 emissions follow suit at 197g/km for Ford versus 206g/km for Mitsubishi, both incurring £260 annual tax.

Dimensions also influence economy: the Ranger measures 5,370mm long with an 80-litre fuel tank, while the L200 is shorter at 5,225mm with 75 litres. Kerb weight tilts heavier for the Ranger at 2,331kg against 1,900kg, potentially affecting agility but boosting stability.

Design and Dimensions Breakdown

Size impacts practicality. The Ranger’s larger footprint (1,918mm wide, 1,884mm tall, 3,270mm wheelbase) offers more interior space and bed capacity. The L200 is more compact (1,815mm wide, 1,775mm tall, 3,000mm wheelbase), aiding maneuverability in tight urban spots.

• Ranger advantages: Bigger bed for loads, longer wheelbase for stability.
• L200 strengths: Nimbler turning circle (12.9m U-turn diameter), lighter weight for easier handling.

Both use body-on-frame construction with leaf-spring rear suspension, a staple for pick-ups prioritizing payload over plush ride.

Driving Dynamics On and Off Road

On tarmac, the Ranger shines with composed handling over bumps, thanks to its suspension tuning. It absorbs imperfections better than the L200, which can shudder at low speeds. Top speeds are 112mph for Ford and 106mph for Mitsubishi.

Off-road, both excel with 4×4 systems, high ground clearance (220mm for L200), and features like hill descent control. The L200’s lighter build may give it an edge in extreme terrain, while the Ranger’s torque and gears suit mixed use.

Payload, Towing, and Utility Features

Payload capacity is strong on both: L200 handles up to 1,020kg, Ranger around 900-1,000kg depending on spec. Towing ratings reach 3,500kg for both, making them capable for trailers or boats.

Bed liners, roller shutters, and tie-downs enhance utility. Options like the Ranger’s £1,500 bed cover add protection.

Cabin Comfort and Technology

Interiors use durable plastics suited to rough work. The Ranger’s SYNC 3 touchscreen stands out for intuitiveness, with leather options in top trims. The L200 packs generous kit like navigation and climate control as standard.

Rear space is ample in double-cab versions, with the Ranger feeling more premium via stitched leather. Safety tech includes airbags, stability control, and lane assists on higher Rangers; L200 offers similar with tire monitors.

Pricing and Value Assessment

The Ranger Limited starts at £34,854 (inc. VAT), undercutting the L200 Barbarian X at £38,640. Add-ons like paint (£600 Ranger, £475 L200) and alloys push costs up, but Ford offers better base value.

Safety and Driver Assistance

Both score well in crash tests, with multiple airbags, ABS, and traction aids. Ranger adds advanced aids like collision avoidance and pedestrian detection in newer models. L200 includes vehicle stability management and hill descent.

Ownership Experience and Reliability

The L200’s 40-year heritage brings proven durability, especially off-road. Ranger benefits from Ford’s updates, with refined manners. Running costs favor the L200 in some markets for lower upkeep.

Pros and Cons Summary

• Ford Ranger Pros: Superior refinement, quicker acceleration, better tech, value pricing.
• Ford Ranger Cons: Heavier, pricier options.
• Mitsubishi L200 Pros: Strong payload, standard features, compact size.
• Mitsubishi L200 Cons: Noisier engine, firmer ride.

Which One Should You Choose?

For refined road driving and tech, pick the Ranger. If budget and off-road purity matter, the L200 delivers. Test drive both to match your needs.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Which is faster, Ford Ranger or Mitsubishi L200?

The Ranger hits 60mph in 11.0 seconds, edging the L200’s 11.2 seconds.

What’s the fuel economy difference?

Ranger gets 33.5mpg vs L200’s 31.4mpg in tests.

Are they good for off-roading?

Yes, both have 4×4, high clearance, and descent control.

How do prices compare?

Ranger is cheaper at entry, around £34k vs £38k for L200 top spec.

What’s the towing capacity?

Both handle up to 3,500kg braked.

Similar Articles

BMW X7 xDrive30d 2019 Review

Alfa Romeo Giulia Veloce Long-Term Review

Audi RS4 Avant Durability and Long-Term Ownership

Audi RS4 Avant Practicality

Audi RS4 Avant Interior

Audi RS4 Avant Engine Guide

Author

medha deb

 

Medha Deb is an editor with a master's degree in Applied Linguistics from the University of Hyderabad. She believes that her qualification has helped her develop a deep understanding of language and its application in various contexts.

Read full bio of medha deb